On July 17, 2006, the U.S. Department of State (DOS) released
the August 2006 Visa Bulletin. While there were no changes in
most categories, there was significant retrogression for persons
born in India. More ominously, DOS indicated that there is
likely to be additional retrogression in other categories in
September. For individuals born in India, EB-2 will move from
January 1, 2003 to "unavailable" on August 1, 2006, due to high
demand in that category. This means
that no EB-2 adjustment of status applications will be accepted
by USCIS after July 31, 2006, regardless of priority date. This
also means that all Indian nationals who presently have an EB-2
adjustment of status application pending at USCIS will see their
cases put on hold while they wait for their priority date to
become current and available. EB-3 for Indian
nationals also retrogressed, moving from April 15, 2001 to April
1, 2001.
It is important to note that "nationality" is not the same as
citizenship. Generally, DOS looks at the country of birth in
determining whether a person is a national of a given country.
As a result, persons who become citizens of other countries
(i.e., Indians who become Canadian citizens) are still
considered nationals of their birth country for immigrant visa
purposes.
A retrogression in the EB-2 category immediately impacts only
those individuals in the final stages of the permanent resident
process (i.e., those seeking to file adjustment of status (AOS)
application, those waiting for an AOS application to be
adjudicated, or those seeking to apply for an immigrant visa at
a U.S. Consulate or Embassy based on an approved immigrant visa
petition). Retrogression has no impact on the processing of a
labor certification application that is about to be filed or is
pending with the Department of Labor. Furthermore, the
retrogression does not prohibit the filing of the immigrant visa
petition (I-140) based on an approved labor certification
application, even if that immigrant visa petition will be filed
under the EB-2 category.
The EB-2 category includes individuals who have labor
certifications filed on their behalf where the requirements were
at least a Master's degree or a Bachelor's degree plus five
years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. National
Interest Waiver cases also fall in the EB-2 category.
Again, beginning August 1, 2006, the U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) will not accept any new EB-2
category I-485 adjustment of status applications for nationals
of India, regardless of the priority date. Jackson &
Hertogs encourages all individuals in the EB-2 category who are
eligible to file an I-485 application to do so before July
31, 2006. Such an application must be received by USCIS no
later than July 31, 2006, which means that applications must be
filed by July 28, 2006. If the I-485 application is
received by USCIS on or before July 31, 2006, the applicant is
eligible to apply for both the Employment Authorization Document
(EAD) and Advance Parole (AP) while the I-485 remains pending.
USCIS will also not be able to adjudicate any pending I-485 in
the EB-2 category for Indian nationals until the underlying
priority date becomes current. Similarly, DOS consular officers
will be unable to approve immigrant applications for permanent
residency until the priority date becomes current.
There were no changes in any other employment-based category
on the August Visa Bulletin. However, DOS advises that "for
September there is increased possibility of additional
retrogressions of cut-off dates," and that China EB-2 and EB-3
and India EB-1 "could experience retrogressions" in that month.
While this does not mean that these categories will retrogress
or become unavailable in September 2006, the DOS prediction of
this possibility suggests it is highly likely.
For more information on the Visa Bulletin and country quota
movements, including information about movement in the
Family-Based Quotas, please see our DOS Visa Bulletin and Quota
Movement page (http://www.jackson-hertogs.com/quota/quota.shtml)
which includes detailed charts of quota movement for the past
decade.
|