On December 5, 2006, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (CIS) published a memorandum from Michael
Aytes, Associate Director, Domestic Operations (hereinafter
"Aytes Memorandum"). The Aytes Memorandum advises USCIS
adjudicators that any time spent in H-4 status does not count
against the six year maximum period of admission applicable to
H-1B aliens. Similarly, time spent as an L-2 dependent does not
count against the maximum period of admission applicable to L-1
aliens. The Aytes Memorandum also provides guidance to CIS
adjudicators on how to calculate H-1B admission periods, and
provides specific guidance relating to H-1B extensions of stay
under the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century
Act of 2000 (AC21).
That time
spent as an H-4 or L-2 dependent will not count against the
maximum allowable period of stay in H-1B and L-1 status
constitutes a significant policy change by the CIS. The Service
has long taken the position that all periods of stay in the U.S.
in H or L status must be counted against the six year limit of
stay for H-1B status, the five year limit for L-1B status, or
the seven year limit for L-1A status. The Aytes Memorandum
states: "an alien who was previously an H-4 dependent and
subsequently becomes an H-1B principal will be entitled to the
maximum period of stay applicable to the classification." CIS
determined that this policy was most consistent with the
statutory framework, and "promotes family unity by affording
each qualified spouse the opportunity to spend six years in H-1B
status while allowing the other spouse to remain as an H-4
dependent." Adjudicators are now instructed that the primary
purpose of dependent status is to accompany the principal
worker, and "a spouse or child may be required to show that the
requested H-4 stay is not intended to evade the normal
requirements for nonimmigrant classification that otherwise
would apply when the principal alien is absent from the United
States. This policy is meant to prevent an H-1B or L-1 alien
from using only occasional work visits to the United States to
'park' dependent family members in the United states for
extended periods of time while the principal is normally
absent."
The Aytes
Memorandum also clarifies that H-1B workers who qualify for
AC-21 extensions beyond the six year maximum need not be
in H-1B status when requesting the additional period of stay
beyond the six year maximum. Aliens who are eligible for an
AC-21 extension may be granted such extensions regardless of
whether they are currently in the United States or abroad and
regardless of whether they currently hold H-1B status. In
determining eligibility for a seventh year of H-1B status, CIS
will focus on whether the alien is eligible for an additional
period of admission in H-1B status, rather than whether the
alien is currently in H-1B status that is about to expire and is
seeking an extension of that status in the United States.
Finally,
the Aytes Memorandum confirms CIS policy that only time spent
physically in the United States counts toward the H-1B six-year
maximum period of stay, and clarifying CIS practice for H-1B
"remainder" applications. The H-1B remainder is the difference
between the six year maximum period of admission and the time
the H-1B worker was in the United States in valid H-1B status.
If an alien who was previously admitted to the United States in
H-1B status was outside the United States for at least one year,
but did not use the full six years of H-1B eligibility, the
alien may either request admission in H-1B status for the
remainder of his/her original six year eligibility, or may
request a new six year period. However, if a new six year
period is requested, the alien will be subject to the annual
H-1B numerical cap. A petition for the remainder of the
original six year H-1B period of admission will not be subject
to the H-1B cap. In order to request the remainder H-1B period,
the alien must document that s/he has been outside the United
States, such as with visa stamps, I-94 copies, and I-797
approval notices. |